[IPMAN]

Hello,

A thread post from WHT was brought to my attention by a close friend.

WHT Post: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...&postcount=111

I am very baffled to think why Unixy assumes I didn’t use the Unixy Varnish Plug-in in my ab tests…

From Unixy himself “Whoever is running that show did not benchmark our plug-in.”

So I post this to set this straight, yes Unixy we did use your Varnish Plug-in and not the default VCL from the Varnish repository like your trying to make people believe.

Infact I used a trial version which was labelled: varnish.unixy.net-1.3b.tar

Why does Unixy feel the need to make up false half baked accusations?

I would also like to point out that yes a member of the Litespeed staff did install Litespeed for me and I also doubled checked to make sure it was a stock installation and nothing more!

I did notice that on the email which I received from Unixy it stated that their would be an installation charge for the Varnish product to be installed so in this instance I got one of my techs to install the Unixy Varnish Plug-in since I felt being charged for installation of a trial product was a little unfair.

So armed with the port numbers I was then myself able to run the simple ab tests as shown in my previous posts, All the ab tests was carried out by me!

For the people of WHT & Litespeed Forums I have enclosed some screenshots to actually prove that yes I did use a trial version of Unixy’s Varnish Plug-in and not the default VCL from the Varnish repository.