
07-18-2011, 09:13 AM
|
|
New Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmanns
We're very angered at this too.
We advertised & test case'd LiteSpeed ignoring the cost for the benefits.
I don't see the benefits of a webserver that restarts every few hours, supports 150/hour, and the updates are terrible.
We don't even get notified or proper releases, change logs are very vague. 
|
Well my personal experiences have been far and wide with Litespeed from early version to the latest and greatest and I have never been slapped with a major "wow" factor for the software. I do give them the GUI is nice for making configuration simple for someone who doesn't want to deal with cmd line/config files, but outside of that I don't see Litespeed being anymore than Apache with a custom LSAPI build to run PHP 5x faster; and it is true if you are a person who doesn't want to spend mass amounts of hours and a good amount of resources to find a good balance with a web server of the same nature as Apache.
I do find that this company is a bit slow and does not seem to like to do requests or suggestions that clients give. Again I know there is a differences between forum support and paid support. I can say at least they have a good base of members that help other members with issues, but simple requests and feature sets to their program seem to not be a high priority for them. But I'm sure they have reasons as to why they do and don't do stuff who knows, its behind closed door we may never see .
I personally find that if you do not like the way a company is running their software it is better to find a solution to that or build your own. Being Apache is one of the biggest backends of servers, you can always write your own stuff for it to speed up everything or use other software or their in connection to others.
|