[cmanns]

Originally Posted by rlshosting

Just wondering. Thank you.

I agree. I'm not going to bash LiteSpeed as I enjoy it's benefit's but our view's changing as the time goes by (and updates)

The restarts every few hours are rather annoying, a product should be able to produce longer uptime then 2-3 hours.

Just saying as opinion to LiteSpeed public relations to think about their opposition. I mean then LSCache requires 2 cpu and VPS is going to be tightened down? If I were to get paid how much I pay yearly to LiteSpeed for slow/buggy updates and often terrible feedback (In tickets, those who represent LiteSpeed here I appreciate your help as always) however 150/hour for support when I'm trying to figure out your odd webserver I've used for years. It's an drop in Apache replacement with lots of low priority changes, why don't we get this webserver past Nginx/etc performance:cost ratio.