
09-15-2012, 11:19 PM
|
|
LiteSpeed Staff
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,220
|
|
the load time 2.991s is fast enough.
Quote:
|
hence these are not getting cached because somewhat fewer requests for them. Additionally, SATA drive might just also be hurting fast retrieval of smaller images.
|
so you think disk i/o may be the cause.
you can do more tests to confirm this : put all the static files in the page in /dev/shm, and add rewrite rule to fetch these files directly from /dev/shm. so this will eliminate disk i/o slowness issue.
|