Looks like it just took forever to generate those files, now their there, then the litespeed munin graphs are working cept the uh requests one I think but I think thats due to change in your rtereport format. I will post the fix if I figure out why those graphs are blank.
Thanks for lack of reply. Version 4.2 seems to be a bad upgrade so far, I've done our own cPanel system and a clients DirectAdmin system. 4.2 reports its not the newest version it feels buggy and I'm not sure how much more I trust LiteSpeed.
I've been told by people I tune their servers amazingly better then the horrible cost they pay you guys, I'm concerned about continuing to use LiteSpeed (and my clients are) with it's price, bugs, issues, and generally Apache and properly setup FastCGI has it been benchmarked? Well I can simply switch to a tuned apache setup and watch graph differences, there's not much on a loaded cPanel system with dozens and dozens of sites switching to Litespeed.
So that makes me and others wonder why are we paying so much? I'm currently devloping a Web Hosting Panel, OS, and Engine. I guess I should maybe blueprint the designs to a better, free to use apache webserver replacement or is LiteSpeed going to get on their ass and product a product that actually works good as it says. Lots of your listed used clients have switched to other solutions, I and my clients are nearing that too.
I'll soon be suggesting against LSWS and for other alternatives like using Varnish & Apache, I currently advertise and suggest client's LSWS. The company's incompetence in providing an enterprise webserver (Feels like it should be free it's not much better then apache, it just bitches in logs about normal DirectAdmin or cPanel htaccess lines.
Anyways hope this is read by proper staff and reacted too. I currently am worrying about continuing to use LiteSpeed with CloudLinux on cPanel systems.