LiteSpeed Technologies
Download Download     Blog Blog     Wiki Wiki     Forum Forum     Store     Contact Contact    

Go Back   LiteSpeed Support Forums > LiteSpeed Web Server > Feedback/Feature Requests > What server did LiteSpeed replace?

View Poll Results: What server did LiteSpeed replace?
Apache 1.x 18 24.66%
Apache 2.x 55 75.34%
Lighttpd 14 19.18%
Zeus 1 1.37%
Tux 0 0%
Squid 1 1.37%
IIS 3 4.11%
Other 3 4.11%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:07 PM
xing xing is offline
LiteSpeed Staff
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 380
Default What server did LiteSpeed replace?

Everyone here at LiteSpeed would be very appreciated if you would spend a few seconds to complete a simple poll to help us better understsand our customers which will in turn allow us to create a even better product.

Please check all that apply.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2008, 09:59 AM
MindTooth MindTooth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 41
Maybe refresh the poll. I want to vote too.

Birger
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2008, 10:46 AM
mistwang mistwang is offline
LiteSpeed Staff
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,590
sure. reopened.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:32 PM
Nokki Nokki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
crapache....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2010, 04:39 PM
xantra xantra is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6
For me, none at this moment

I readed so much around about litespeed that I decided to get 14 days trial and if it shows to be like advertised, then I would have gotten license.
I liked this picture, two apache servers = one litespeed.
Long story short, it doubled my CPU usage. Load average with apache in 24 hours period was 0.50 on Q9550 server with 8GB of RAM, while using litespeed it got to 1.10. Huge CPU usage.
Then, I got disappointed by the support. To be more precise, the lack of it. I sent an e-mail to support almost 2 days ago with few issues I have, nobody answered. Forums cannot be the only support channel for something that you pay for. At least not for me.
In the end, I decided to go back to crapache (as Nokki called it). It simply works, and it's widely supported.
I am mostly disturbed by the misleading marketing. Just one example, if you click here, you will see that LiteSpeed is officially recommended by the WordPress team. Which is not true. WordPress team recommends Apache or Nginx.

I promise to try litespeed again in an year, just to see if things have moved forward

Last edited by xantra; 02-25-2010 at 07:34 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:33 AM.



- Archive - Top
© Copyright 2003-2011 LiteSpeed Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.