Mod_Pagespeed Downside?

[bloom360]

Is there any downside or any "cost" (memory, incompatibilities, complicated ongoing management, etc) of enabling Pagespeed on 5.2.x?
Lastly, I am running LS on WHM, I can't find the equivalent module on Easy Apache 4 so I presume I must enable it directly on the LS console? I see it there, but I thought there would be a way to activate it from WHM via Apache config?

Regards

 

[NiteWave]

please refer
https://www.litespeedtech.com/support/wiki/doku.php/litespeed_wiki:config:enable_pagespeed

 

[bloom360]

Thanks for that.
In your experience what makes a page load faster, LS CACHE or Pagespeed? I am currently using LS Cache and quite happy with it but Google complains that my website needs Webp and non render blocking scripts etc

 

[NiteWave]

lscache cache dynamic generated pages which usually the bottleneck, usually it's much more important than pagespeed which optimize static contents.
you feel your website fast -- this is most important. you can refer the complaints, and spend time to fix them, or ignore them if no time available. may not be so important --- it may take many many time to fix them but only gain little performance.

 

[Unique_Eric]

Hi bloom360
As NiteWave said, website fast is most important.
There is a wiki compare Pagespeed and LS CACHE, which you should use/enable.
https://www.litespeedtech.com/suppo...eed_wiki:config:compare_pagespeed_and_lscache