Search results

  1. T

    Some benchmarks by me

    Hey, Maybe we can share some configuration files then, I'am not entirely satisfied with the nginx performance, its supposed to kick the shit out of everything you can think of, except litespeed with lsapi then. But the newest lighttpd pre release with the new mod proxy core balancer is...
  2. T

    Some benchmarks by me

    Hi, Thats why i wrote in bold letters that the nginx results are not correct :). Due to a typo in my configuration file it used only 3 mongrels and 1 mongrel was in it 2 times. The real performence is like 130-145 req/s for the frontpage test. Next weekend or friday i will do the benchmark...
  3. T

    Some benchmarks by me

    Im currently rerunning the tests without doing it on the localhost. apperently its not a good thing to do :). results will be updated soon.. update: my network isnt capable of handling such remote requests (wifi :P), so i think these results are the best i can get from here..
  4. T

    Some benchmarks by me

    Hi, I've done some benchmarks for a typical rails scenario. I've uploaded the results on my server here: http://static.intellicode.eu/benchmark/ litespeed seems to beat any other configuration. and this is just the standard edition. (if you dont allow links to your own site please remove it)
  5. T

    gzip doesn't work with rails on static content

    I seem to have fixed it, i didn't knew litespeed made some kind of .lsz files. Turned out that the permissions where not ready for that. Now after the first request which is not gzipped the content is delivered gzipped.
  6. T

    How did you hear about LiteSpeed?

    textdrive benchmarks :)
  7. T

    gzip doesn't work with rails on static content

    Hi, All my files which are served staticly like stylesheets and html files are not gzipped, all my rails html output is gziped though. This is my config: Enable Compression Yes Enable Dynamic Compression Yes Compression Level (Dynamic Content) 6 Compressible...
  8. T

    recommended rails performance tuning

    What is recommended for the best performance? And how can i start the app on load time i seem to have missed it somewhere. thanks!!
  9. T

    recommended rails performance tuning

    Hi, i've been playing a bit with the server now and i found that the first request to a new page are generally pretty slow (5-20 req/s) while the next ones are usually much and much faster. When i changed the max idle time for LSAPI in the env vars text area to 300 the slow loads did...
  10. T

    running rubyrunner or lsapi?

    Hi, I just installed litespeed + ruby lsapi. Works great only the first request is a bit slow in rendering. However while i was getting some errors i noticed this in the log: /opt/lsws/fcgi-bin/RailsRunner.rb:12 is my rails app running on rubyrunner or lsapi? Any way to check it?
  11. T

    LiteSpeed 3.0 Web Server Beta

    Ok, that sounds clear to me. Gonna try out this wonderfull webserver right now :)
  12. T

    LiteSpeed 3.0 Web Server Beta

    Ok just for the record, when you mean concurrent users you mean: - users who are all at the same second active downloading files from your server - when they are done they close the connection? - they use 1 connection for all files also what happens if user 151 connects?
  13. T

    LiteSpeed 3.0 Web Server Beta

    Will the final standard edition have 300 concurrent connections again or does this mean its permanently decreased to 150?
Top