Search results

Ah! Good to know, thank you !

The URL of Unixy say Independent benchmarks have shown that UNIXy's Varnish Cache and Litespeed run much faster than Litespeed's own cache module. https://www.unixy.net/secure/knowledgebase/141/Which-is-faster-Litespeed-Cache-or-Varnish.html What is this? Can we use it to have Litespeed...

The release notes say Improved Cache engine with new cache-control directive and ESI URL fixup. Do you have any documentation how to manage this new cache controls via users .htaccess? As far as I understand, in general 5.2.x have alot of cache related improvements. Any best practice articles...

This way module is enabled for all web sites, right? Its not a best idea, so how to disable it by default but let enable pagespeed per web site lets say via .htaccess? Is it even possible? BTW pagespeed breaking javascript minification for some sites. Doing LoadModule pagespeed_module...

Well, Looks like we were experiencing different kind of network issue, not related to the 5.1.13. I read you blog post and now I know what happened and what is fixed. Sorry for disturb you ;) All looks fine now.

What exactly was a target and how did you fix it? We are on 5.1.13 now and looks like our web servers are still affected.

Are we affected too? https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-8740 http://www.mail-archive.com/announce@httpd.apache.org/msg00106.html

I've sent a patch to Giam Teck Choon aka CHOON.NET Support <support@choon.net> for review, so may be soon it will be available in public...

haha, they decided to change some functions while minor release :) what a nice surprise....

Anybody tried to compile latest php 7 with X-PHP-Script patch from http://choon.net/ ? For me it fails with /usr/local/lsws/phpbuild/php-7.0.12/ext/standard/mail.c: In function ‘php_mail’: /usr/local/lsws/phpbuild/php-7.0.12/ext/standard/mail.c:340: warning: passing argument 1 of...

HTTP/2: Imperva Hacker Intelligence Initiative Report Reveals Four High-Profile Flaws in the Latest Version of the Worldwide Web’s Underlying Protocol http://investors.imperva.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=247116&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2192322 Wonder how litespeed deal with such? Any plans for defense?

Hello, How to check if server is vulnerable? We run only php via LiteSpeed SAPI/suEXEC mode.

yes, may be. i created a ticket

It does not generate any core, at least there is nothing in /tmp/lshttpd/

Uf... still crashing time after time Jun 14 14:36:43 host kernel: litespeed[1260]: segfault at 4a ip 000000000047816c sp 00007ffd9e7d7930 error 4 in lshttpd.5.1.6[400000+545000] Jun 14 14:36:43 host kernel: litespeed[1259]: segfault at 4a ip 000000000047816c sp 00007ffd9e7d7930 error 4 in...

Works now, Thank you!

cat /etc/issue CentOS release 6.8 (Final) Kernel \r on an \m uname -a Linux 2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 31 21:57:07 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Here we go, right after update 5.1.5 > 5.1.6 root 4487 4.4 0.4 106488 81624 ? SN 11:23 0:25 litespeed (lshttpd) root 4488 0.0 0.0 6156 484 ? SN 11:23 0:00 \_ httpd (lscgid) httpd 7424 1.7 0.0 0 0 ? ZN 11:26 0:07 \_ [litespeed]...

For me difference is in mod_security emulation. 5.1 can pass files to clamav using @inspectFile. The rest difference is minor.

I see 5.1.5 available for download. Why it is not announced?