Search results

mistwang, Thanks for the replies. I look forward to the official release. One question if I may, how will the cpu numbering work? For example I have single cpu VPSs and and quad core VPSs. Will there be one 'generic' of the VPS edition or different ones like the enterprise edition? Sorry about...

Just caught this on the site, so I may have jumped the gun but there is no way to actually order the VPS version? I am very excited about this - does it differ greatly from the enterprise edition? (The compare link only shows the free vs enterprise edition). I know several people who will...

Hi, I've been using PickledOnion's articles on Litespeed at http://www.usefuljaja.com/litespeed When I first started using Litespeed I found them useful, I also think it would help with your PHP install as it includes the commands and prerequisites needed and also has screenshots of every...

mistwang: Thanks so much for the quick response and although it was part of another thread that the "?" issue came from, I am very impressed with the speed of an update. Oh, in case I haven't made it clear - all is well with the newer 2.5. Thanks.

Hi, This is going to very vague as I am not sure what or how to report it: I use Mephisto as my blogging software and have no problems with it (I love not messing around with mongrels!). Anyway, I updated to ruby-lsapi 2.5 and the administration functions failed with 'resource required'...

Wow, thanks for the suggestions guys. I will look at them all and see what's best. My spirits have been lifted :p mistwang: your link (bsSvnBrowser) is spot on. Obviously I have to test it but thank you so much!

Thanks for the quick responses. I am not sure what to do now. I must admit it is pretty essential. I am loathe to install apache just for that. Darn it.

Hi, I have been using Litespeed for a while now and love it. However I have come to a show stopper in that it doesn't seem to support subversion. Now, for any trac management projects I have (which litespeed handles very well) I need svn repos accessible via the web. Is this still correct...