High memory usage in LS compared to Passenger/Mongrel etc

Discussion in 'Ruby/Rails' started by subBlue, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. subBlue

    subBlue Active Member

  2. mistwang

    mistwang LiteSpeed Staff

    Yes, they certainly can make it looks even worse.

    You can ask them to run LiteSpeed under Ruby Enterprise and configure LiteSpeed not to start that many ruby processes, at least make it matching the number of ruby processes started in all other tests.
  3. mistwang

    mistwang LiteSpeed Staff

    Also have LiteSpeed pre-start the parent ruby process.
  4. andreas

    andreas Well-Known Member

    The problem seems to be that it is not possible to tell LSWS exactly what you want. If I configure a number of processes, autostart, no max requests, no timout, I still see processes randomly getting started and killed.
  5. mistwang

    mistwang LiteSpeed Staff

Share This Page