Search results

I have setup my blog on a bit more professional hosting. Please link to this page http://codedlite.com/blog/?p=12 if you want to post it in the wiki

Yea no problem.

I really like LS. So, I have put together a screencast on setting it up for a rails site. Now, Im pretty boring so try not to die of boredom. Constructive criticism would be appreciated. Cheers, NC...

Awesome thanks!, I see now. You guys ROX!

I have the same issue. It seems that only one of the nodes will get the traffic. Here is what I have in my Node Address List: Strategy is It seems the last node address gets the load because, for a test I swapped out the .2 and .7 addresses to confirm this behavior. Perhaps I have...

This may not be specific to rails app, but I need to set up a site that we can have any sub domain for a site which will forward to the same rails app. Any ideas on this?

I am seeing this in the error log. Seems there is a missing gem. However its not telling me which gem is missing. I am seeing this alot. [LSAPI:STDERR]: SIGUSR1 [LSAPI:STDERR]: ( [LSAPI:STDERR]: SignalException [LSAPI:STDERR]: ) [LSAPI:STDERR]: from...

I would also like to see merb support.

Thats is an interesting solution. I think that would be a decent work around. I would still like to see LS implement a commandline individual site reload. Thanks fantasydreaming!

How? Dont see it on the Server > logs tab. Dont see it in the htaccess config section.

I have LSWS setup to allow the evaluations of .htaccess files . Now when I look at my error.log file, I see a ton of [REWRITE] entries. Is theres a way to have LSWS be less verbose on the rewrites rules evaluations in the error.log file?

In "Server" > "Ruby on Rails" the setting for "Connection Keepalive Timeout" if this is set to 120, will it kill a connection(rails process) after 120 seconds of it being initialized, even if it is being activity used?

mistwang, bravo guys. That is a refreashing policy IMHO.

I am on the 3.3 version. I do not have this issue. If feasible, you might try reinstalling.

I have also seen this as well. I have rails sites that use the same template which should only have 1 max connection , yet in the real time stats, I see a couple of those sites having a max con of 2 We are not on the trial key.

ok I have upgraded to 3.3.1 but I am still getting 503 errors 2007-12-05 08:31:02.058 [INFO] [IP:60241-5#www.site.org] connection to [uds://tmp/lshttpd/www.site.org:_.sock] on request #0, error: Connection timed out! 2007-12-05 08:31:02.058 [NOTICE] [IP:60241-5#www.site.org] oops! 503 Service...

Thanks for the quick reply. I would be crying to. The upgrade was pretty painless.

Will upgrades overwriting anything in the conf directory?

You guys are awesome!

Do you have an estimate time frame on this release?