Search results

Firefox 11 will have SPDY by it's mid-March release: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/02/spdy-brings-responsive-and-scalable-transport-to-firefox-11/ So the two most popular browsers will have it, as well as options for nginx and apache. Is SPDY support on LiteSpeed's radar?

I have a rather old install of litespeed on centos that ended up in /opt for some reason on a CentOS system and it's gotten a little messy. I'd like to uninstall and then reinstall it clean. It's a licensed copy - are there any concerns to worry about? ie. do I need to release the license and...

Given how litespeed runs and manages php, is it technically possible for it to use the mod_ruid2 suexec module? Or is this impossible, maybe unnecessary? The idea is it would stop reading/writing files as nobody and work as the user. Cpanel has supported this for apache+php since...

I was looking at a new litespeed test install and I noticed something that seemed new in the exteral app settings: 127.0.0.1:2086 127.0.0.1:2077 127.0.0.1:2095 127.0.0.1:2082 Is this an attempt to make cpanel use litespeed instead of their slow apache backend? Or is it just a reverse...

Thanks for the quick fix - will have to build much later tonight because it's an active server and can't risk the loads. At first I didn't think that PHP does a chdir to the executing script's directory but I guess it does since wordpress tries to use require('./wp-load.php') which implies a...

I believe I have run into a compatibility bug with litespeed's SAPI when using a matching build of the cpanel PHP for apache PHP can be executed from the command line of course - we use this for various reasons, typically in cron to execute things like WordPress maintenance and avoid wasteful...

Wow even better. Top notch responsiveness from litespeed. Greatly appreciated. Happy to beta test once a download is available.

Is it possible to edit the internal error templates for litespeed? Or are they hard coded into the binary? ie. to change the the Internal Server Error message

Oh duh, I am duplicating questions, very sorry http://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/showthread.php?t=5536 You can delete this thread if you'd like.

I just noticed this is periodically happening in the logs File not found [/usr/local/apache/htdocs/whm-server-status] I vaguely recall cpanel polls that normally to make sure things are running and possibly do a restart if it's not there? This is a problem because while it's in...

Nice! Thank you very much for working it out. I will apply it later today and confirm how it works live. I did not know you could force mime types like that, apparently it really is in the mod-rewrite spec and litespeed implements it too. Fantastic work.

Ah I see what it does http://localhost:7080/status?rpt=summary Except we don't run admin panel on standard port and use SSL ;) You'll have to allow config somewhere for other advanced users, and I recommend a curl option with -k to ignore certificate. Basically I can use that exactly like...

Sad to report that idea doesn't work either, but it seems clever and plausible. Why would litespeed ignore that environment directive? Is it just too late at that point to trigger the override?

Wouldn't you have to test the physical file and not the url ? Unless I am mistaken, that rule tests the url super-cache is rewriting a regular url to the .html.gz But the point is moot anyway, I tested by accessing a direct .html.gz and it doesn't work either though I have to find...

Until we figure out another workaround, rather than disable super-cache gzip, I simply added one rule to the top of their .htaccess rules to skip the .gz version for litespeed This might help someone in the future as it's an instant workaround RewriteCond %{SERVER_SOFTWARE} !LiteSpeed...

Some searching shows this is a common problem with anything that tries to pre-cache .gz (also drupal) http://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/showthread.php?t=5268 http://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/showthread.php?t=2010...

On a new install where wp-super-cache is trying to serve it's own pre-compressed files, litespeed seems to be sending them as binary when apache gets it right. Perhaps I need to exclude recompressing them somehow? Works fine in apache, litepspeed serves garbled (looks like native gzip)...

Oh wow, never knew about that. I really need to catch up on all the newer 4.x+ stuff.

Yes I am aware of that feature but in some situations I want to give others access to the activity without admin access to the server. This way I just pw protect the directory and give them access that way. Maybe the stats could be accessed via some kind of api.

It would be interesting if litespeed could support the apache directive SetHandler server-status to get a little text based status report for the server and currently open connections. Obviously low priority but just an idea for one more bit of apache compatibility. I should point out apache...