Search results

Upgrade your server or use one with better performance.

Sitemap doesn't matter. Your server is the problem.

Problem is not the sitemap. The problem is caused by the server itself. Performance of the server is insufficient to run a website. Each request of a uncached URL takes too much time and that's why the cache rebuild seems not to work.

LiteSpeed offers its own HTTP compression, but on server level not on application level. This can be gzip or br. In both cases it's the same if gzip is enabled on application level, but you better should use gzip/br compression on server level. This is because if gzip is enabled on application...

First of all and this you surely know is, that LScache is a HTTP cache. That means, that every php based file/URL is cached if it is part of the request. The result of this cache is the generated output of a request. This is the basic function of a HTTP cache. If LScache is enabled by a single...

Each cache plugin is different and each plugin has different functions, so I don't know exactly why gzip has been disabled. But you can check if gzip is still running. Open developer console in browser and check http headers of the main document. If there is a header: content-encoding: gzip or...

Why to waste resources if there is no advantage? You have a shared hosting with very limited resources, but you want to warmup cache for bots for 8.000 items?! Again, you don't get any advantage for whatever. Save resources for things you better should use for selling. Knock Knock! Is anybody...

No, never ever! Google bot doesn't respect session cookies, but it isn't completely excluded, that Google accepts cookies. Anyway, why should bots support cookies and what should it good for related to LScache?! If you set nocache for bots and if you place this rewrite rule on top nothing else...

But beware of using the posted code. The publisher of this code seems not to have much practical experience with LiteSpeed and LScache. You will need a lot more of code to get no troubles.

This is not a extension or a plugin. Posted code is what I posted before, only rewrite rules for minimum functions, but it works.

Of course Litespeed cache can be used with Flarum and almost any other applications, but there is no LScache plugin for Flarum available and LScache needs LiteSpeed webserver to be installed. If your hosting allows to replace current webserver (Apache?), you can install LiteSpeed webserver. If...

https://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/threads/lscache-expired-early-than-cache-publictll-settings-help-explain-and-understand.20367/page-3#post-118731

I give up. Good bye.....

If Pagespeed score increases only if you make cache available for Google bot, there is something wrong. REALLY! There is no Google bot that measures the speed of your page. All data for speed calculation are based on data only coming from Chrome User Experience Report. Think about it, if you...

You should change LiteSpeed server version to LSWS and hosting with (almost) full access to server configuration. With LSWS only 1 click in LSWS admin panel must be done to change location of stored cache files.

No and of course this is not wrong, but the question is, do you get what you expect?

Do you have any restriction defined in .htaccess or firewall?

Sorry, I can't answer your last post. I don't know what cache varies you have defined, but if you think something is wrong and it doesn't work as you believe it should, check your cache varies. There is definitely something wrong with it!!

First of all you have to know is, that Pagespeed doesn't measure the loading time. It measures the "display time" after all data has been loaded from the server. LiteSpeed cache is speeding up the loading time, but not the display time, because only the php based main document is affected from...

Check this: https://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/threads/tls-ssl-cipher-removed-in-version-5-4-5-build-3.18298/