Per vdomain limitation with plesk apache httpd.conf

Discussion in 'General' started by TarkanVeKurdu, Dec 20, 2008.

  1. TarkanVeKurdu

    TarkanVeKurdu Member

    Hi ,

    We are using the latest version of litespeed web server enterprise edition. We are using litespeed with plesk and litespeed is reading the httpd.conf files without problems. However I cant define per domain connection and bw limit with this configuration. How can I do that ?

    My second question is if I define a per client bandwidth should it applies to php cgi scripts also ? I want to define the output bandwidth which the cgi and php cgi files generating.

    Per Client Static Reqs/sec
    Static Requests/SecondSpecifies the maximum number of requests to static

    Syntax: Integer number

    Per Client Dyn Reqs/sec

    Per Client Bandwidth: Out/sec

    Per Client Bandwidth: In/sec

    Best regards,
  2. anewday

    anewday Moderator

    It is not possible to define per domain connection and bw limit if litespeed is configured to read from Apache httpd.conf. This is a feature I've requested and hopefully it is added in the 4.0 verion.
  3. TarkanVeKurdu

    TarkanVeKurdu Member

    Hi ,

    mistwang is there any stable release date for the 4.0 version ?

    We also have one more problem with litespeed versus apache. Apache has a good status page with mod_status . We can see which page is being executed with full path at that time and take any actions if needed. But on litespeed we cant see which page is being executed and its becoming too hard for the system administrator to resolve a problem. Is there any plan to add this feature on 4.0 version ?

    We need something like this :

    88.251.19x.156 GET /v2//components/com_jomcomment/template/boxy/image.jpg

    78.17x.45.102 GET /forum/Themes/minerva_1-1/images/maintab_back.gif HTTP/1.1

    66.x49.72.167 GET /index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=1&extmode=week&date=20

    8x.105.174.110 GET /imagesekim/orgu16.jpg HTTP/1.1

    Best regards,
    Last edited: Dec 25, 2008
  4. TarkanVeKurdu

    TarkanVeKurdu Member

    mistwang ?
  5. mistwang

    mistwang LiteSpeed Staff

    This topic has been discussed on the forum extensively, please check previous discussions.
  6. anewday

    anewday Moderator

    Yes, I already requested a better status page. I hope it will be as good or better than lighttpd. ;)

Share This Page