Search results

Well we have tried everything. That error still showing in logs. Me and the client have no clue what we can do. Any help would be much appreciated

Continued from email correspondence. I tried to add the rwrite log level to httpd.conf as well as log file but neither seems to be working. I added this in httpd.conf between the VirtualHost directives RewriteLogLevel 9 RewriteLog /etc/httpd/logs/rw.log The rewrite rules in question...

Ok So I set this up on the real server right? not the proxy server? Will it affect other configs? For example the real server is directadmin using apache config. Or would I just make a vhost out of the proxied site and do it that way? Never mind I found it, just enabling that feature eh on the...

I recently setup a proxy through lsws from a ddos protected ip to a non protected ip. Everything works ok but of course all users have the same ip. Is there any way possible to work around this? Both servers are litespeed. EDIT: Well I guess that is pretty retarded question and not possible the...

the real time stats are awsome! great Job George, this is one heck of an upgrade!

Is it just me or 4.0 is like a lot faster then the 3* series? Me and my clients on all servers noticed a huge difference as soon as I upgraded. Anyone else have similar results?

Well that was with eaccelerator disabled. I know to update it with php update. We eventually had to leave php526 on there until some update. I suppose its like they said, only happens with large include files so as of now I dont know what to do for it. This is with same exact php.ini as we have...

I have always been using the mod sec 1.9x rules for litespeed. i was wondering if lsws will work with the new 2x rules. Any idea on that guys? Annyone tried?

the OP is a lil demmannding i think. Would be interesting to know this site of his. Anyway, litespeed is exceptional serving media or images. Some high traffic sites running litespeed are funnyordie.com, supernovatube.com, and astalavista.com. the first two are media sites, images and videos...

George is there any way possible to increase this limit. Basically the clients coder told him nothing is wrong with his script and that we need to fix it on server side because it does work on apache

not sure, its some software the client had installed. Is there anyway to increase the limit?

I got a client who has been getting 503 errors on a script they have. the error is this 2008-09-20 12:42:08.477 [WARN] [75.181.94.88:1795-0#APVH_faunaads.com] LSAPI Packet is too large: 66008 2008-09-20 12:42:08.477 [INFO] [75.181.94.88:1795-0#APVH_faunaads.com] connection to...

no i promise only litespeed was reading those files. Changing the config in litespeed admin for minmum perms fixed it. Actually if all systems were to read that config in litespeed they would read 000 files as well. I just happend to have a server read that config and was therefore reading 000...

thats not a big fluxuation at all. So many factors in play in interpretaing load like amount of cpu cores , etc but none of them you posted above are high load..

Well I found the issue. In the File Access settings they are all set to 000 default. Now the thing is all my other servers are like this as well but they must not read that. I guess this last server DID read that config and served all 000 files Why is it default at 000? If alny server read that...

I had a permission issue with lsws reading 000 files. I tried everything couldn't find what was the issue. I looked in litespeed admin and seen teh file access settings, I first tried to set it to the 0004 as described, didnt work so I changed it to an actual chmod setting of 644 and its now...

image/icon got it

The favicon mime type is messed up. Ive tried adding it under different things, it still wont work, - http://www.zomganime.com/favicon.ico

well it does no good with litespeed as I think litespeeds sets its own ulimits whicvh includes core files. Generally it is located in /etc/security/limits.conf but from experience will do no good with lsws There is a patch george made and posted in one of my threads, it works, search for it

that will be nice. I didnt know that used ssi though, thought it used perl but I guess it makes sense now why it didnt work. We tried to use it on supernovatube before and had to just use litespeed for video backend. When this is fixed will be able to use litespeed for everything or at least try it